Home
About Us
Consulting
Instruments
Governance
Needs Assessment
Survey Platform
Case Studies
Capacity Building
Contact Us

Governance Instruments - Governance

  • How does your Board perceive its performance?
  • Are members aware of their responsibilities?
  • Does the Board 'add value' to the organisation?

    The aim of Board Self-assessment is to ensure that members are aware of their responsibilities, that, as a Board, they ‘add value’ to the organisation and where their performance as a Board needs improvement this can be addressed.

    The Self-assessment process also reassures members at large that the Board is giving due consideration to its governance responsibilities including its reputation for transparency and accountability. Board Members are invited to assess the effectiveness of the governance processes within the Board.

    The instrument is custom designed to suit the following sectors:

    • Not-for-profit
    • Public sector, including health
    • Education  

    Expertise

    The Centre for International Corporate Governance Research at Victoria University is recognised for its expertise in reviewing and designing corporate governance practices in both the public and private sector.

    Anona Armstrong, author of the Board Self-assessment instrument, is Professor and Director of the Centre for International Corporate Governance Research. She is a leading expert in corporate governance practices and has authored several books on governance including a checklist for assessing corporate governance for Standards Australia’s “Guidelines for Board Governance”.

    Dimensions

    The Board Self-assessment instrument is taken by each Board member who is asked to rate the following dimensions using a sensitive 7-point scale:

    1. Leadership. which describes who is on the board, their competencies and skills

    2. Structures and Relationships, which describes the scope of board responsibilities

    3. Accountability, which describes how the board monitors business activities

    4. Compliance, which describes how business standards are met

    5. Performance, which describes how the board monitors business outcomes

    The instrument is aligned with the Standards Australia International (SAI) framework and provides a profile of Board Structural, Operational and Maintenance elements.

    Framework

     
    "All organisations need an effective risk management system. In years gone by, we thought it was embraced by having an effective internal control system in place. We all know now that this does not go far enough”.

    Wayne Cameron, Victoria Auditor General 2003

     

    Reports

    Benchmark. The Board Self-assessment instrument is customised to suit specific market sectors. As a diagnostic tool the self-assessment is benchmarked to AS800 and highlights areas of strength and areas that would benefit from improvement. In addition, results benchmark data against similar industries.

    Profile. The Board Self-assessment instrument is aligned with the Standards framework and provides a profile of the Boards structural, operational and maintenance elements
     
     
     
    Fig 1. Board Self-assessment benchmark report
    Fi g 2. Board Self- assessment profile report
     

    Professional Services

    We can assist with a variety of service level options, ranging from a fully automated process to a complete project implementation.

    Service Level
    Self-assessment Options
    Level 1
    Standard instrument with system report
    Level 2
    Custom instrument with system report
    Level 3
    Project implementation
     
    The level of service and customisation will depend on your requirements and environment.
    Find out more about how the instrument works with you by contacting Anona Armstrong at CICGR.
     
     
    At -a- glance
    Design Model
    Professor Anona Armstrong’s Corporate Governance Framework. Profile is aligned with AS800 standards and benchmarked against similar industries
    Completion Time
    15 -20 minutes
    Sections
    Five dimension clusters of varying number of items
    Rating Scale
    Seven-point scale
    Items
    Standard 35 forced-choice and one comment
    Target
    Board members, in not-for-profit, public sector, and education sectors.
    Validity
    Formative and summative.
    Aligned with relevant SIA standards.
    Report format
    3 levels of information depending on requirements:
    : Standard system profile and benchmark report
    : In-depth analysis by Anona Armstrong
    : Full report including recommendations
    Delivery Method
    Online instrument, utilizing e-valuate-IT®
    Access Method
    Consultant facilitated
    Contact
    Customer enquiries to Anona Armstrong
     
  • Printer friendly


    Want to
    know more?


    Survey people online

    Self-assess your Board's effectiveness



    HOME    ABOUT US    CONSULTING    INSTRUMENTS    SURVEY PLATFORM    CASE STUDIES    CAPACITY BUILDING    CONTACT US    
    © 2007 Evaluation Solutions